Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson and Rajya Sabha MP Sonia Gandhi has accused the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led central government of valuing confrontation over consensus. This criticism, articulated in an editorial published in The Hindu and shared by Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge on his X handle, encompasses a range of issues from the NEET-UG paper leak to ethnic violence in Manipur.
Sonia Gandhi’s Editorial: A Scathing Indictment
Sonia Gandhi’s editorial is a pointed indictment of Prime Minister Modi’s governance, alleging a stark disconnect between his rhetoric and actions. She claims that Modi, while publicly advocating for consensus, continues to adopt a confrontational approach in dealing with critical issues facing the nation. This, she argues, undermines the democratic fabric of the country and exacerbates societal divisions.
The NEET-UG Paper Leak: A Case of Administrative Failure
One of the focal points of Gandhi’s critique is the recent NEET-UG paper leak. The incident has sparked widespread outrage among students and parents, who see it as a failure of the government to ensure the integrity of a crucial examination. Gandhi contends that the government’s handling of the situation reflects its broader tendency to ignore constructive dialogue and meaningful reforms in favor of superficial measures and punitive actions.
Manipur Ethnic Violence: A Reflection of Deep-Seated Issues
Gandhi also highlights the ethnic violence in Manipur as a glaring example of the government’s confrontational stance. The violence, which has led to significant loss of life and property, underscores the need for a sensitive and inclusive approach to conflict resolution. However, according to Gandhi, the government’s response has been characterized by a heavy-handedness that has only deepened divisions and fueled further unrest. She argues that genuine efforts at consensus-building and dialogue with all stakeholders are essential for lasting peace, but these efforts have been conspicuously absent.
The Paradox of Modi’s Third Term
In her editorial, Sonia Gandhi raises doubts about the legitimacy of Narendra Modi’s third term as Prime Minister, asserting that there is no clear evidence to support it as an electoral outcome. She suggests that Modi continues to govern as if nothing has changed, maintaining a facade of consensus while actively pursuing policies that provoke confrontation. This paradox, she argues, is at the heart of the current political malaise in India.
The Importance of Consensus in Democracy
Gandhi’s criticism centers on the fundamental democratic principle of consensus. In a diverse and pluralistic society like India, governance that seeks broad-based support and inclusivity is crucial. Consensus-building involves engaging in open dialogue, listening to dissenting voices, and finding common ground. According to Gandhi, Modi’s government has consistently failed to uphold these principles, opting instead for a majoritarian approach that marginalizes opposition and stifles debate.
Legislative Actions: Hastening Without Heeding
A significant aspect of Gandhi’s critique is the manner in which key legislation has been passed. She points to instances where important bills have been rushed through Parliament without adequate debate or consultation with opposition parties. The passage of the farm laws in 2020, despite widespread protests and calls for dialogue, is a prime example. This approach, Gandhi argues, is emblematic of the government’s preference for confrontation over consensus.
Economic Policies: Benefiting the Few
Gandhi also criticizes the government’s economic policies, arguing that they disproportionately benefit large corporations and the wealthy elite at the expense of the broader population. She cites the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and demonetization as examples of policies that have adversely affected small businesses and the middle class. The lack of broad-based consultation and the perceived arbitrariness of these measures, she argues, are further evidence of the government’s confrontational approach.
Conclusion
Sonia Gandhi’s critique of Prime Minister Modi’s governance underscores a significant and ongoing debate about the state of democracy and governance in India. Her assertion that Modi’s actions starkly contradict his calls for consensus adds a powerful voice to the discourse on how best to navigate the nation’s future. As India grapples with its challenges, the tension between rhetoric and reality will continue to shape its political landscape, highlighting the need for a more inclusive and dialogic approach to governance.